He’s a locked-in RB2 rest-of-season and I tend to dislike trades where you’re losing the best player in the deal. Second, you are sending away the best player in this trade: Damien Harris. First, I don’t like being on the receiving end of more players than I’m giving, though we’ve talked about this ad nauseum. Previte: I’m giving this trade a B-minus. Ray writes: “Grade this trade: Send Damien Harris and Kadarius Toney for Myles Gaskin, Allen Robinson and Jared Cook.” My one piece of advice would be that if it does look like Wilson is coming back, you could deal one of your three start-able quarterbacks in exchange for a skill position player. The Seahawks are 2-5 and are in last place in the NFC West they are unlikely to make a run for a playoff spot this season. He could return very soon, though there is a risk that if the Seahawks lose this week to the Jaguars, they’ll lose incentive to bring him back. I would hang onto Wilson simply due to upside.
And even if he does, there’s absolutely no guarantee he’d be better than Stafford or Burrow - especially if Watson is traded to the Dolphins, who don’t exactly have a star receiving corps. I’ll preface this by saying that my mild Law And Order: SVU addiction is the extent of my legal prowess, so take all of this with a grain of salt, but I don’t see Watson playing this season. Both also have good matchups this week against the Texans and Jets, respectively.Īs for your other two quarterbacks, if you need the space, I’d advise dropping Watson. Stafford and Burrow are studs and should be QB1s rest-of-season. I’m going to assume this is a two-quarterback league since rostering four QBs otherwise would be unwieldy. Previte: First, congrats on somehow having four good quarterbacks on your roster. Do I hold onto Wilson/Watson and make a move at a later time?” Pictured: New York Giants quarterback Daniel Jones What To Do With Deshaun writes: “ Stafford, Burrow, Wilson, Watson…. Still, I like the game script in Giants-Chiefs more, but both should be good starts this week. It was actually the only game in which he passed for multiple touchdowns, and he did it without Julio Jones and A.J.
Tannehill did have his best game of the season against the Colts in Week 3 and scored 23 fantasy points. Jones is my top streamer of the week and should have some decent upside, especially given his rushing and if he gets some of his injured receiving corps back. The Chiefs defense has looked abysmal, giving up the seventh-most passing yards and second-most fantasy points to opposing quarterbacks. Previte: It’s really close but I would lean Jones.īoth have solid matchups this week, but Jones’ is superior.
Ryan Tannehill Or Daniel writes: “Who should I start this week? Tannehill or Daniel Jones.”
JARVIS LANDRY FANTASY FULL
Herbert has done enough to establish somewhat of a role for himself in this offense, even once Montgomery returns - or at least enough to make Montgomery managers nervous - so Herbert is definitely worth hanging on to, even once the backfield is at full strength. Herbert is matchup-proof and seems to be unhampered by the fact that the Bears scored only three points total in that game. Herbert was also more involved in the passing game and caught 5-of-5 targets for 33 yards while Williams caught one target for three yards. Herbert saw 18 of the 21 running back carries for 100 yards last week against the NFL’s best run defense while Williams saw only three carries for five yards. Want personalized lineup advice? Have start/sit questions? Want me to adjudicate dicey league disputes? Email with your questions each week to be featured in this article and on Action’s Fantasy Flex podcast every Thursday hosted by yours truly.įantasy Start-Sit Questions Bears Backfield writes: “Khalil Herbert or Williams until is back? Enquiring minds want to know!”